User:GGHTOO/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Modern architecture - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I love modern architecture and it is important because the ideas from it can be used to inspire people to create new forms of architecture just like how older forms of architecture inspired its creation. I took a class that talked about modern architecture a couple years ago, so I already had an idea of what the article was, so I didn't have any preliminary impression of it aside from how interesting the topic is to me as a person who has a minor in architecture.

Evaluate the article
The lead section includes an introductory sentence, is clear and concise but the brief description of the article's major sections does not include all the major sections. The article's content is relevant to the topic and the content is kind of up to date with the sources ranging from 1970s to 2010s. The article is balanced and has a neutral tone with viewpoints being presented equally. It talks about modern architecture without being bias or talking more about one thing more than the others. The article is mainly backed up by reliable secondary sources that are thorough, and some are current. The sources come from a variety of different authors and are written from the 1970s to 2010s. The links also work correctly. The article is for the most part well written and well organized with little to no grammatical/spelling error but is rated as c-class. The images used in this article are mainly well-captioned, have a visually appealing layout, follow Wikipedia's copyright regulations, and help in understanding the topic. The type of conversations that are happening behind the article is about things such as how people felt about some quotes and/or sentences used in the article and how to improve the article. They also talked about the different styles of architecture. The article is rated as c-class and is part of wiki projects. There is not much difference in the way Wikipedia discusses this topic from the way we've talked about in class. The status of this article is a level-4 vital article. The strength of this article is that it uses a lot of helpful visual elements to help the readers better understand the topic and see it for themselves. However, the article can be improved if it cited all its sources and fact-checked everything. Overall, I would assess the article's completeness as well developed, but could use some improvements.