User:GN-z11/Basic admin criteria

Wikipedia has no minimum requirements for adminship, and while I am not an admin, I've seen more than a few RfA's and noticed a few trends that lead users to support a RfA. This could be useful for you whether you're requesting for adminship or voting on one. I generally agree to most of these.

Common criteria

 * The user has had way more good interactions than bad interactions with other users.
 * The user has never (or almost never) assumed bad faith.
 * The user has at least 5,000 total edits.
 * The user has been on Wikipedia for 30~ months.
 * The user frequently contributes to the Wikipedia namespace.
 * The user admits to being wrong.
 * The user helps out newcomers often and may have even offered to adopt users.
 * The user has a decent history of vandal-fighting (probably around 250 vandal/disruptive reverts is enough). Having rollback rights helps as well.
 * The user frequently creates and participates in AfDs.
 * The user has experience with reviewing, having used pending changes reviewer rights in the past is a big plus.
 * The user hasn't been blocked more than thrice.
 * Any NOTHERE indef disqualifies the user automatically.