User:GRuban/Mass Communist RfC

Talk:Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes/Archive_39
 * 1) Should we always discriminate between the introduction to the BB and the BB proper every time the introduction is cited?
 * 2) Should we always explain that the introduction is "controversial" when the BB introduction is used as a source?
 * 3) Should we always describe the controversy around the figures presented in the introduction when the introduction is being used as the source for these figures?
 * 4) Should we explain the objections to the "generic Communism" concept every time the combined "Communist death toll" calculated in the BB introduction is being discussed in an article?
 * My very best wishes - No; No; No; No
 * number 2. The specific controversy on the introduction needn't be discussed more than once or twice. GPRamirez5
 * Yes, yes, yes, yes, Aquilion
 * Delete Article - NickCT
 * No, Yes, No, No Chris Troutman
 * Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes. RhinoMind
 * No, No, No, and No. XavierItzm
 * Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Paul Siebert
 * yes, Not quite. Not quite. Not quite. — SMcCandlish

I realises that my questions #2-4 were not precisely formulated: I obviously meant "explain this on first occurrence in each article". --Paul Siebert (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

No, this was not obvious at all XavierItzm

Totals:
 * 1) NYNYNYY ; 4/3
 * 2) NYYYNYy ~5/2
 * 3) NYNYNYy ; ~4/3
 * 4) NYNYNYy; ~4/3