User:GRuban/RSNP

"It wouldn't be an automatic removal, obviously. It would be handled on a case-by-case basis with priority given to replacing the source with an equal but reliable one."


 * 112 Ukraine Removed 50 sources in 60 minutes, none replaced.
 * ThePeerage.com Removed 500 sources in 2 days Removed another 500 sources in 4 days Another several hundred sources removed
 * Removing deprecated unreliable sources royalark.net, worldstatesmen.org etc due to misleading content Most several per minute. Another 500 Another 400 Another 500 Another 400 Another 300 Another 400 Another 300
 * Epoch Times 22 removals, average of 3 a minute, not replaced, often removing cited content
 * CGTN (TV channel) 30 removed, under a minute per, not replaced Another 20-odd Another 40
 * The Blaze 250 sources removed in 2 days.50 more

AIV

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1066#Indiscriminate_removal_of_deprecated_sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1028#User%3ADavid_Gerard_and_The_Sun_sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1038#User%3AHorse_Eye_Jack_continued_undiscussed_mass_removal_of_sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive405#Blacklisting_sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1087#User:David_Gerard_violating_Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources#Acceptable_uses_of_deprecated_sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive315#UK_newspaper_sources_and_how_to_handle_deprecated_sources?
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1045#Clearing_down_review_backlogs_of_deprecated_sources:_call_for_assistance