User:GS214/Social comparison theory/Icarlee3338 Peer Review

General info
User:GS214/ Social Comparison Theory
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:GS214/Social comparison theory:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Comparing the sandbox page to the original article itself, it is clear that the group only focused on the media influence section. The original article consists of many different subheadings and sections, that is not featured in the sandbox. Therefore, the "lead" can not be assisted because they haven't mentioned what social comparison theory is yet.

In regards to reviewing the Media Influence section, everything that has been added was valuable and reliable. It showcases how heavy media influence is on everyone.I enjoyed reading the additional studies and surveys that you mentioned that the original article did not. I did wish some of the studies mentioned how recent they were. If it shows that this happened recently it can add credibility to your point. I noticed upward comparison was mentioned numerous times throughout this section. Maybe make an additional subheading or at least link what that means. Not everyone may be aware of what it means.

Overall, I think you guys did a great job adding to the media influence. Once the other sections are added I think everything will tie well together.