User:GS2325/Knowledge gap hypothesis/Jenct93 Peer Review

General info
GS2325
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GS2325/Knowledge_gap_hypothesis/Jenct93_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Bibliography looks good but not sure if were are supposed to have links that verify articles. Some were not clickable.

Lead and paragraphs are good.

In the last sections, the formatting looks like there are extra spaces. Did you want to space out the data or compact it? Tone and writing look great. I just wonder on your citing in the articles, they seem to be in the middle of your statement instead of maybe at the end. I am not sure if that is correct format, but it does read with a citation and then a statement after.

This Social Differentiation link does not seem to work, its defining something else.


 * 1) Level of homogeneity of the community - Because smaller, more homogeneous communities tend to exhibit less social differentiation and variety in sources of information than larger, more heterogeneous communities, homogeneous communities tended to exhibit smaller knowledge gaps than heterogeneous communities.