User:GZhen/Bloodstain pattern analysis/Jencastiel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

GZhen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:GZhen/Edits Sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bloodstain pattern analysis

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of the article is well written and provides a good reflection on what the rest of the article is about. The lead gives a good definition of bloodstain pattern analysis, how its used, and why it is used. The lead includes criticisms to the use of bloodstain pattern analysis creating a neutral and unbiased tone for the article. The writing is a little choppy but it gets the point across in a clear manner. The sections have a clear structure and ordered in a sensible way. As previously stated, the article is well balanced and reflects the benefits and critics of bloodstain pattern analysis. The article is factual and shows a clear reflection of various aspects on the topic. The references are from well sourced, reliable journal articles from several different journals based on forensics and criminal investigation. Each statement is properly cited and presented. The image presented enhance the understanding of Impact Spatter and is properly cited. Overall the article is good and has helped in the completion of the article itself. The content added is factual and laid out in a way that is understandable. The only criticism that I have is that the writing is a bit choppy.