User:GabrielleSlyfield/History of psychotherapy/Alyssa736 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) GabrielleSlyfield


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * History of psychotherapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

So far I do not see any edited work done by my peer. There for, the lead does not represent added material from my peer. However, the organization of the article can be improved upon because I do not see any headers and the lead seems to lack the necessary information to explain the article. The content, however, is well structured with good grammar. The article is written nicely and is easy to follow along. I think to further improve the organization of the article would be to create a better timeline shown by headers instead of keeping the article restricted to one long section. The tone is well balanced and I can't seem to find any type of biases. I think that to include more information we could include more facts of the history of the people mentioned in the article such as Sigmund Freud. The article does contain an image that helps show the readers what the intent of the author means. However, the image is shown off to the side and I believe another image could be added to help the article become more visually appealing. The bibliography does include sources to be added to the article. I think that these will be good improvements to the article. Overall, I think once GabrielleSlyfield finishes her draft and includes in into the article it will help the overall quality of the article become better.