User:Gabutler/Reverse psychology/JeTTblxck Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gabutler


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Gabutler/Reverse psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reverse psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I believe this article could benefit from a more detailed background on the concept of Reverse Psychology. The section in the Psychological Reactance Theory was well written and has a neutral tone; however that being said, I agree with the instructor feedback that in my limited understanding and reading of the topics reverse psychology and psychological reactance are not interchangeable. Instead, I believe reverse psychology can be a product of that psychological reactance, which is something that you could potentially develop upon by trying to expand on a more refined explanation than the one that is currently provided for the phenomenon of reverse psychology itself. You could also discuss more about psychological reactance and how it interacts with reverse psychology. More sources would be needed so you would have to include those in your references as well. Overall, I think you have a great direction so far and your ideas are already improving the article from what it was originally. Great work!