User:Gabutler/Reverse psychology/Lindseyfturner106 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Gabutler)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gabutler/Reverse_psychology?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Reverse psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I am only able to see one paragraph you inserted under "Psychological Reactance Theory." Though it is a small insertion, it is extremely detailed and you seem to really understand the theory. The topic of "reverse psychology" is one though that could be expanded on. I would add some more information overall on the whole topic. Under each sub-heading, I think adding more information would be beneficial and help individuals understand the bigger picture better. For example, you could maybe consider adding some examples and real world applications of it so individuals who don't quite understand it can apply those examples. You could also maybe add charts and visuals for individuals who tend to gravitate towards visuals. The reference you added is reliable and is not out-dated. The tone is neutral by what was added so far and I believe you understand the idea of remaining unbiased when inserting your contributions to the article. The overall article is lacking information though and seems uncompleted to me.

Regarding the spelling and grammar, I noticed no errors and your writing style is formal and organized. I am interested in reading your future contributions on reverse psychology as a whole.