User:Gabyflores27/Hedwig Codex

The article's content is relevant to the topic because it describes who is being portrayed in the Hedwig Codex and its history. The lead in the article is short but explains the basic information about the manuscript. The history section in the article is overdeveloped compared to the lead and the lead. An element that makes an article not so good is its imbalanced sections. Relevant sections are missing and indicates that the article is weak as it is now. The citations are also imbalanced since one source is from 1972 and the other source is from 2010. Only providing two sources is another weakness that this article has. Editors have also added a [citation needed] tag to a statement in the history section that needs a reliable source. I also noticed that the way the article is written is another weakness because even though the lead section was easy to read, the history section was hard to read and can be hard to understand for people not studying medieval art.