User:Gabyhanze/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Leonor Villegas de Magnón

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

It is a topic that I'm interested in, and it relates to my course.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article is concise, well-organized, and unbiased. It covers a topic from Mexican and Mexican American history and Mexican women's history, Leonor Villegas de Magnón. Most of the sources appear up-to-date (from the early 2000s) given that the article is about a historical figure. There are only 6 sources, 2 of them being the different versions of Magnón's novel. There is not that many sources, but there is also not that much information. The article could go into more detail as far as her notable achievements during the Mexican Revolution as well as the affiliations she had with prominent revolutionary figures.

On the talk page, it looks like only one or two editors have contributed to this article which might explain its brevity. There are no pictures or images on the page. Overall the page feels somewhat bare.