User:Gadsuy56/Choose an Article

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Canadia spinosa


 * Article Evaluation
 * Written neutrally
 * has good sources, but source variety for claims in the material is lacking, especially within the "Classification" section
 * Dose not seem to conflict with other articles or topics
 * some spelling errors
 * expands on extinct Annelids


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Juana


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lacking a large amount of material, sources, and basic information
 * needs descriptions of what makes the genus and subgenus(s) distinct from others


 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Pleistoannelida


 * Article Evaluation
 * Good neutral presentation
 * Reliable sources that back each claim, but could use more source variety on Annelids in the group
 * Is Lacking descriptions on the taxa characteristics that define the clade Is tackling a section of Annelids not covered well on Wikipedia Is relevant to the topic


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources