User:Gaeun Choi/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nature conservation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate the nature conservation article because, one, my long-established interest in biodiversity and ecology, and two, the potential changes I can make to better the article by adding and deleting content.

Evaluate the article
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Some content in the article overrepresents and underrepresents information. For instance, the introduction includes a statement that says, "The consumer conservation ethic is sometimes expressed by the four R's: Rethink, Reduce, Recycle, Repair." This statement is not so relevant to be at the very beginning of the article. Hence, statements like these can become mere distractions about conservation and should be erased.

Where does the information come from?

While some references come from reliable sources (journals, first-hand accounts, other original content), others come from unverified science websites. References coming from undependable sources should be reevaluated.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

In the lead of the article, it states data from 2018. There should be updated data from 2021.