User:GafferMaffer/OLES2129

TUTORIAL ONE:
Today’s Date: 19/03/19

Article name: Welcome to Wikipedia ("Main Page")

Number of page views in last 30 days: 502,819, 417

Daily Average of page views: 15,791,435

Total number of edits: 4,208

TUTORIAL TWO, ACTIVITY TWO:
Article: Douglas MacArthur

Creation Date: April 11th 2002

If I was the second reader, things that I would change about this article would be:


 * Adding pictures to break the info up
 * Accomplishments including his reputation as being the United States' youngest Army General
 * Information in regards to his early life and education, basically just to access how these factors played a role later in his life
 * More details in respect to his career, e.g. the New Guinea Campaign, his role in the Philippines during World War Two, involvement in the Korean War and the occupation of Japan
 * The transition to retirement and his post-career life, what that entailed and how that was impacted by his previous achievements

In sum, these are some features of Douglas MacArthur's life that would need to be considered in the creation of a Wiki Article. As such, if I was the second reader and was responsible for making these edits, these are some of the elements that I would incorporate into my response.

Activity 1: Quality and Importance Ratings in WikiProjects
Article that is being examined: Rosemary Spencer

To elevate its status to an A-Class article rating, the author must incorporate:

- Information about her early life, death, accomplishments and career.

- Why she is notable and significant, what did she do as a civil servant and diplomat that made her stand out?

- More contextual information, possibly in regards to UK's relations with the Netherlands to underpin why her role as a diplomat was so important

Activity 2: Citation Needed
Article examined: 1896 in India

Why it needs a citation:

- Needs to substantiate the claim that the Bubonic Claim killed a lot of people

- Evidence needs to substantiate the claim of the beginnings of the famine and where it began

TUTORIAL 4:
Activity 1:

- How they illustrate the benefits of the work and then put forward Bloch's opposition. The author does this through the use of quotes and a brief analysis of how they reject Bloch, which is a good idea to integrate into my response.

- Section on historical method and approach is a good idea to demonstrate the historiography of his topic and how his work attempts to gear historiography down a different avenue. Additionally, subsequent paragraphs of his methodology could provide a good summary of his approach and why it was so significant. As such, it could provide a good overview for Marks too.

- Areas of interest section also provide a great summary of his texts and historical approaches. If this was to be used in my article, it could provide a nice overview of the critical arguments and ideas of Marks piece.