User:Gainag/Digital Preservation Coalition/Ginnerz06 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gainag


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gainag/Digital_Preservation_Coalition?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Digital Preservation Coalition

Lead
This section of the article includes a clear, concise introduction to the DPC written by a different user. It has not been updated to reflect the new content added by the author. It appears there many be enough content to include a brief description of the articles major sections in this Lead section.

Content
The first sentence in the Mission section could be reworked with several citations including exactly when sharing information digitally was a ground-breaking act, how long it's been evolving ("constantly and quickly" should be removed or replaced with more explicit descriptions), and what secondary sources can back up claims of "not much attention paid". The remainder of the Mission section is relevant, up-to-date, and written well.

In the Resources section consider replacing "Their" with "The DPC". The remainder of this section is relevant, up-to-date, and written well.

The Advocacy section provides relevant information to this topic, but it reads like it was published by the DPC. Consider adding more citations from publications that are not authored by DPC members that can validate the significance advocacy efforts.

The Membership section is is relevant, up-to-date, and written well.

Tone and Balance
The majority of content added is neutral but the viewpoints from DPC may be over represented. Additional secondary sources should be sought out that publish content about the DPC. Nothing that is being added appears to be heavily biased or persuasive.

Sources and References
As noted above, additional sources should be sought out that report on the DPC. While this article is about a specific organization and it makes sense to have multiple citations from DPC authored material, there is still a need to put this organization in the context of its industry, other players (possibly competitors), notable associations and possibly examples of organizations directly citing the DPC as an asset or hindrance to digital preservation efforts..

Organization
The information that has been added so far is well-written. I do not notice any glaring spelling or grammatical mistakes aside from a missing period in the Full Members section. The major and sub sections are logical and easy to follow.

Images and Media
Images and media have yet to be added by the user in this draft. From a review of the current version of the article as well as the draft written by this user, I do not think there is any pertinent place where images or media would enhance the content. If this user wanted to add an image of the current logo for this organization, that would be the only thing I would consider adding to visually enhance this article.

Overall Impressions
This draft is in good shape. Once the Mission content is modified and additional sources are sought out, the Lead section should be updated to reflect the content of the article body. These revisions and additions will improve the quality of this article.