User:Gallowayctiii

Introduction

Consequence Management (CM) for Department of Defense (DoD) personnel is the response to a catastrophe of national significance involving people and property that requires the added support of military and other Department of Defense assets. Consequence Management is not solely the operational, tactical, and technical act of responding to an incident, but also includes the planning, preparation, recovery, strategic policy, and doctrine of a vigilant reaction to an incident. Additionally it is important to note that Consequence Management can be in the response of natural, accidental, or man-made incidents. It can be in the response to an earthquake, tsunami, tanker spill, or terrorist incident involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

In the event of the a WMD incident Consequence management in called CM of WMD, signifying an act of significance and with an intent to cause harm to those by-standers, political persons, or government organization as a target. CM of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and Explosive incidents (CBRNE), or in some circumstances depending on policy differences (CBRN) which is the exclusion of Explosives, is the same in principle to the response and preparedness of WMD, however the intention of the response is focused on the hazard and effects rather than the employment and target.Terrorist incidents or WMD incidents require research, analysis, and investigation of the effected area in order to gather evidence for forensics investigations. In all instances the Department of Defense is in support of and enables the whole of government response to incidents upon the activation of protocols, whether those circumstances are Domestic Consequence Management (DCM) or (CM) and Foreign Consequence Management (FCM). In the case of response in the United States, the Military’s support is provided to the Department of Homeland Security and mainly the Federal Emergency Management Agency in what is called Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA). There are, however, other incidences that can theoretically trigger CM operations in which the DoD forces initiate a response without the supervision of another governmental agency.

Purpose of Consequence Management

Understanding CM is an important part of being knowledgeable about the United States efforts to prevent loss of life, provide safety, and prevent the effects of panic in the country. CM is a means to have an active response, ensuring prior planning and pre-positioning of efforts in the event that there is a tragic incidents with a high risk of consequences. Since 9-11 the United States is faced with a changing world, a shift in the role and function of adversaries, and a need to remain vigilant against surprise and catastrophic attacks. The military and civilian components of the United States Government, such as the; Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Defense and it various Combatant Commandants and Agencies, and the Department of State all have a stake in protecting the nation, allies, and interests world wide. This mission drove the creation of public policy like the National Incident Framework and later the National Incident Management System. Additionally principles learned from miners, fire fighters, police officers, military structures, and environmental agencies were incorporated into general knowledge and a comprehensive Incident Command System. Consequence Management is related to, however different than, the definition of Emergency Management and Crisis Management. Consequence Management is the military term for the equivalent Emergency Management for civilian agency response to incidents in the United States. Consequence Management is also a term utilized by Department of State in support of Host Nations and friendly (permissive) foreign countries, although the stipulations and legal aspect of the definition can vary greatly. Crisis management, according to JP 3-41, The Joint Publication for CBRN CM “is predominantly a law enforcement response and involves measures to identify, acquire, plan, and employ the use of resources needed to anticipate, prevent, and/or resolve a threat or act of terrorism”, which adds a comparison and contrast to the definition for added clarification.

Defining Consequence Management

CM is part of a greater effort in provide national security to the United States homeland. The National Strategy of Homeland Security (NSHS), written by the Homeland Security Council in 2007 speaks to an overall effort to thwart the advances of U.S. adversaries, but remains cautioned in the government’s approach realizing that against all efforts an incident may occur. The NSHS states “Despite our best deterrent and mitigation efforts, terrorist attacks and natural disasters will happen, and we must work to minimize the consequences of their occurrence”, which is how the government bases its need for a comprehensive resiliency plan. The National Military Strategy for Combating Weapons of Mass destruction (NMSCWMD) goes into more detail with exactly how the military will play a role in the overall U.S. Government mission. The NMSCWMD details the eight mission areas that it will focus on in order to Combat WMD, naming CM as one of those areas. The NMSCWMD states on page 38 that,

''“Consequence Management includes those actions taken to reduce the effects of a WMD attack or event, including Toxic Industrial Chemicals and Toxic Industrial Materials, and assist in the restoration of essential operations and services at home and abroad. U.S. Armed Forces must be prepared to support the response to a WMD event in the homeland and, when directed, support allies and partners”.''

This statement adds more language and definitions to DoD’s role and purpose to support. This definition and addition has a focus of two types of incidents. First it details the military focus on WMD incidents showing incidents with intent, hazard, and an assumed target of an adversary. Secondly it identifies a focus of hazards such as Toxic Industrial Chemical (TIC) and Toxic Industrial Material (TIM) incidents, which lack intent and targets and are therefore CBRN CM. The Joint Publication to Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction in 2009 gives regulation to the definition by stating “Actions authorized by the Secretary of Defense to mitigate the effects of a weapon of mass destruction attack or event and, if necessary, provide temporary essential operations and services at home and abroad”, adding guidance to the direction stated in previous policy.

To gain a fully encompassing view of CM, the definition of CM to the military responder, operator, and units needs to be understood from the Field Manual 3-11.21, the Multi-service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Consequence Management gives add operational verbiage to the military community. The manual states that CM is “Actions taken to maintain or restore essential services and manage and mitigate problems resulting from disasters and catastrophes, including natural, man made, or terrorist incidents”, and additionally it names CBRN hazards as

''“Those chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive elements that pose or could pose a hazard to individuals. Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive hazards include those created from accidental releases, toxic industrial materials (TIM) (especially air and water poisons), biological pathogens, radioactive matter, and high-yield explosives. Also included are any hazards resulting from the deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction [WMD] during military operations. Also called CBRNE hazards”. '' This definition is important because it opens the realm of understanding to include WMD, TIM, TIC, and CBRNE while also highlighting the difference between WMD and CBRNE. It is important to highlight that CM is the only item found in both the 3 pillars to Combat WMD found in the National Strategy for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (NSCWMD), and the 8 mission area found in the NMSCWMD giving a strategic focus and a military policy focus on CM, which effects both actions and visibility to CM operations.