User:GameKeeper

No to copyleft
I do not like the copyleft implications of the GFDL and believe simple Public domain licensing to be more free. Any images I upload from now on will bear a Public Domain license. I would welcome any comments on this on my talk page. I cannot see how GFDL can be seen as more free than a license that has less restrictions. Any interesting arguments will be stored here.

my stuff

 * edit count +more
 * another user monitor tool
 * hit rate
 * User:GameKeeper/useful
 * User:GameKeeper/reqphotots
 * List of United Kingdom locations
 * 

To Check
Category:Pages with misplaced templates

Fun/Interesting articles
Jimmy Carter's rabbit Prince Rupert of the Rhine

Sandbox
User:GameKeeper/Sandbox

note
p589 the ants Dorylus wilverthai queen 52mm  Oligomyrmex minor workers 0.75mm Australian Ants: Their Biology and Identification p149  0.75 and 52 mm

AL822/288
Thanks for the clarification re https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Talk:Australopithecus_afarensis#Why_no_distinction_between_AL288_and_AL822.3F_Do_we_think_it.27s_a_typo.3F. I must admit my experience is outside the field of anthropology, but perhaps that's a feature, in terms of Wikipedia's general audience. This issue of Australopithecus and afarensis keeps cropping up in the news, as more research comes out. I also appreciate dave_souza's comment clarifying that 822/288 is not a typo. If this article is confusing for college-educated me, it must be more so for the average person that creationism media targets. Keep up the good work clarifying. SalineBrain (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)