User:Gaoy53/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Legal Remedy


 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead of the article introduces the concept of legal remedy precisely and concisely. However, the body of the article needs substantial improvements because relevant facts are missing and academic and reliable sources are not used to support the content. The wording of the article is vague, and its organization and structure is of poor quality. More information should be added to explain different kinds of legal remedies, their application in legal settings including influential cases, and the impacts and controversies around the subject.


 * Sources
 * Schwartz, Victor E., and Liberty Magarian. "Challenging the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages: Putting Rules of Reason on an Unbounded Legal Remedy." American Business Law Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, Fall 1990, p. 485-498. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ambuslj28&i=531.
 * Kramer, G.P., Kerr, N.L. & Carroll, J.S. Law Hum Behav (1990) 14: 409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044220
 * Levin, Ronald M. "Vacation at Sea: Judicial Remedies and Equitable Discretion in Adminstrative Law." Duke Law Journal, vol. 53, no. 2, November 2003, p. 291-388. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/duklr53&i=305.
 * Ware, Donald R. "Research Tool Patents: Judicial Remedies." AIPLA Quarterly Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, Spring 2002, p. 267-316. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/aiplaqj30&i=275.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Right to Privacy


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article contains close paraphrases and violates the copyright of the sources that it uses, so it needs to be revised and edited. The subject is not a term used exclusively in the United States, so it is necessary to discuss a worldview of the subject. There are multiple categories of invasion of privacy including appropriation, intrusion, publication of private information, and false light. However, the article fails to provide details about violations of privacy, and the information is not up-to-date.


 * Sources


 * Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. "Right to Privacy." Harvard Law Review, vol. 4, no. 5, 1890-1891, p. 193-220. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hlr4&i=205 . Posner, Richard A. "The Right of Privacy." Georgia Law Review, vol. 12, no. 3, Spring 1978, p. 393-422. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/geolr12&i=409 .  Rubenfeld, Jed. “The Right of Privacy.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 102, no. 4, 1989, pp. 737–807. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1341305. Accessed 18 Jan. 2020.  Nizer, Louis. "Right of Privacy - A Half Century's Developments." Michigan Law Review , vol. 39, no. 4, February 1941, p. 526-596. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mlr39&i=546.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * National College Entrance Exam


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is not concise enough and contains many details that might not be useful for potential readers. Great length of the article is used to state criticism of National College Entrance Exam, which threatens the neutrality of the article. In addition to that, more sources need to be cited to verify the accuracy of the facts. The section that discusses the impact of this exam is over simplified and requires additional information to establish the importance of the article. Overall, the article is well-written and up-to-date, and the sections included in the article help readers grasp important concepts.


 * Sources
 * Yuan Feng (1995) From the imperial examination to the national college entrance examination: The dynamics of political centralism in China's educational enterprise, Journal of Contemporary China, 4:8, 28-56, DOI: 10.1080/10670569508724213
 * Gareth Davey, Chuan De Lian & Louise Higgins (2007) The university entrance examination system in China, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31:4, 385-396, DOI: 10.1080/03098770701625761
 * Yu, Lan & Suen, Hoi. (2005). Historical and Contemporary Education Fever in China 1 Historical and Contemporary Education Fever in China. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy. 2.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Prior restraint


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article focuses on the view and application of prior restraint in the United States but fails to address the status of the subject in other countries. The wording of the article is not precise, and many details that relate to the subject and can improve readers' understanding of prior restraint are not included in this article. Therefore, the article can be expand to the impact of prior restraint to different professions and its legal implications.


 * Sources
 * Emerson, Thomas I. "The Doctrine of Prior Restraint." Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 20, no. 4, Autumn 1955, p. 648-671. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lcp20&i=654.
 * Jeffries, John Calvin Jr. "Rethinking Prior Restraint." Yale Law Journal, vol. 92, no. 3, January 1983, p. 409-437. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ylr92&i=433.
 * Blasi, Vincent. "Toward a Theory of Prior Restraint: The Central Linkage." Minnesota Law Review, vol. 66, no. 1, November 1981, p. 11-94. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mnlr66&i=55.
 * Redish, Martin H. “The Proper Role of the Prior Restraint Doctrine in First Amendment Theory.” Virginia Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1, 1984, pp. 53–100. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1072824. Accessed 18 Jan. 2020.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Three Strike Law


 * Article Evaluation
 * User:Gaoy53/Evaluate an Article
 * Although this article is specific, organized, and well-written, its information needs to be updates. It needs to be improved to reflect the First Step Act that was incorporated into the law. Also, the article should discuss the application of law in different states and important cases in regards to the law. The articles address the criticism of the law but lacks the opinions of the law's supporters, which can make the article partial.


 * Sources
 * California's Three Strikes Sentencing Law. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.courts.ca.gov/20142.htm
 * Definition of Serious Felony Offenses. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/parole/non_revocable_parole/serious_offenses_defined.html
 * A Primer: Three Strikes. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.lao.ca.gov/2005/3_strikes/3_strikes_102005.htm#crim%20justice%20system
 * Inmates Sentenced Under the Three Strikes Law. (2010). Sacramento, CA: California State Auditor, Bureau of State Audits. doi: https://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2009-107.2.pdf
 * "Three Strikes" Law. (1993). 23(1, START II SUPPLEMENT), 2-2. Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/sp/3strikes.pdf
 * Miller, B. (n.d.). Evidence Does Not Support Three-strikes Law as Crime Deterrent. Retrieved April 21, 2016, from https://ucrtoday.ucr.edu/9405