User:GardenofG/sandbox

The article I will be reviewing today is the article of a semi-popular pop artist best known as Eden. The initial class has been graded as a start class, and there is most definitely information that can be added and information that can be sourced better. One of the second resources within the articles looks to be sourced as independent research and therefore cannot be sourced on Wikipedia so additional sourcing will likely need done here. Further sources could be added to the second paragraph on Wikipedia too, lots of the information there is not sourced. More could be added to the “early life” category and the one source within this category is technically a direct source and would technically need sourced differently. The next section labeled, “2013-2015 The Eden Project”, has an immediate problem once again providing information without sourcing, something that can easily be changed. Throughout the section, the only information sourced are three individual songs. The next section labeled, “2015–2016; Change to Eden, End Credits, ITYTTMOM and Futurebound Tour”, has more pressing problems once again providing essential information that again, is not sourced. The article States that in this period Eden had changed his name from “The Eden Project” to “Eden” without providing any tangible evidence. I also personally believe that these sections could be made more concise. I do not believe the information needs to be thrown in with different albums. The article often talks about Eden charting on the Irish album charts, but the source is just the Irish charts, I would consider this to be independent research and therefore this would need a better source. The next section within the article labeled, “2017–2019; Vertigo and Vertigo World Tour”, is the most well-made text within the article due to the number of accurate sources and information contained. This section of the article will not need much work done. The next section within the article labeled, “ICYMI” by far needs the most amount of work. Not much information is provided in this section and NO sources are provided for the text, evidence that can easily be provided. This section is followed by another labeled, “personal life” though I am not sure why this is here for all it adds is that Eden donates, more could most definitely be added here, and some information could be taken from other sections and be put here. To summarize, the article is not sourced well and does not come across fluent or consistent. A lot of work will need to be done, I will say however that the article does a respectable job of staying unbiased throughout and just provides information, even if it is not sourced.