User:GartholomuleIII/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Trivium

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article about Trivium because I thought it would be a good beginner lesson in evaluating the certain aspects of Wikipedia based literature. Trivium is an important part of educational history, being used to describe the combination of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (the lower division of the seven liberal arts). My initial thoughts on the article were that it seemed a bit light, though the information seemed solid and well written.

Evaluate the article
As previously stated, I found the article interesting and well-written, though it seems a bit light for the topic.

Lead- The lead is concise and allows the reader the option of a quick summary or a more detailed explanation.

Content- The content of the article appears up-to-date and reliable. Perhaps there could be more detailed examples of trivium in history.

Tone- Tone is very neutral and does a good job staying away from biased words or sources. Flows very matter-of-factly.

Sources- Sources in the article all appear to be reliable and unbiased. Writer has "Further Reading" sources to allow the reader to continue learning about the topic through sources deemed reliable and informative.

Organization- Article is very organized and concise, no issues.

Images/Media- The media in the article is composed of two pictures, one in the main description section and one on the far right of the lead. I think the picture in the lead section could be swapped for a better, more aesthetically pleasing place in the middle of the lead rather than the right side.

Talk Section- The talk section behind this article is relatively stale, where the most recent comment was from 2014, and before that 2007. The article is apart of a few WikiProjects like WikiProject Higher education. It is rated Start-Class, Low importance.

Impressions- The article was written well and excels in conciseness, though I wonder if more content can be added to make it feel less barren. The sources and flow are among its strong suits and it is in low to moderate need of editing.