User:Gasdoc1991/Smoke inhalation/DrFRahlouni Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Whose work are you reviewing?

Gasdoc1991

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Smoke inhalation


 * Lead: Clear and easy to understand. Great expansion of lead and summary of topic.
 * Content: Relevant to topic and up-to-date. Addition of epidemiology and mechanism tied in well.
 * Tone and Balance: Article is written in a neutral and non-biased tone.
 * Sources and references: Relevant sources were used and links work.
 * Organization: Sections of article are well organized in a logical structure, and important aspects of the topic were addressed.
 * Images and media: No images added, but pictures could be helpful. Adding to the infobox may be beneficial.
 * Overall, great work! Strengths demonstrated by this article are the addition of information to the underdeveloped sections and breadth of information covered. I would suggest adding to the infobox and consider adding a section on prevention.