User:Gavinjarman/KdpD/KdpE two-component system/EdgarCorrale0619 Peer Review

Lead

 * The article has no headings. There is basically no information about this topic on this article.

Content

 * There is only one sentence written on this article. Going forward, the people working on this article need to add information that is relevant to their topic. Start off with the history of two component system and then go more into the physiology.

Tone and Balance

 * The article is not complete so I cannot asses this topic. I would recommend that when the people contributing to this article are writing the article try to just write down what is relevant to your topic without trying to make the readers think a certain way.

Sources and References

 * There is only one peer reviewed paper cited in the article. The peer review paper is a "good" source.

Organization

 * The article is not organized because it is barely being built.

Images and Media

 * There are no images found in the text.

Overall impressions

 * The article definitely needs a lot of work. I am excited to see what this article turns into.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)