User:Gavinjarman/KdpD/KdpE two-component system/SnowEm Peer Review

General info
(Gavinjarman)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Gavinjarman/KdpD/KdpE two-component system
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):KdpD/KdpE two-component system

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead provides a good idea of what the functions of the system does, but I'm not sure it describes what it is. The lead/introduction could describe more specifically what the major topics of the article will be. I think its a good start, but the ideas could be connected together to make it more cohesive.

Content

The content added to the article is both relevant to the topic and up to date. Additional content will help strengthen the article and provide a greater understanding of the topic.

Tone and Balance

The article is free of bias appears to be neutral. No arguments are present, and no one side is being more heavily explored than another.

Sources and References

There are frequent references and sources cited throughout the article. The sources are up to date, and there are a variety of sources thus far. As more information is added to the article, additional sources will help make a comprehensive article free of bias. The links on the resources are functional, and all appear to be appropriate sources for the topic explored.

Organization

I think the article could be a bit more organized. It is hard to tell where the lead section and introduction sections are separated. As more information is added to the article it should be organized into specific sections to help guide the reader through the topic.

Images and Media

The addition images depicting the subject matter, or diagrams depicting how the system functions would be a nice visual source for readers. '

Overall the article is a great start! I can start to see the directions the article will go, and as more information is added the more cohesive it will become.