User:Gaw301/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Rod Cell
 * This article has a banner at the top, indicating tat it needs additional citations for verification, which is really attractive for improving it. It is also rated a start class, which shows potential. When talking about structure, I see that the article lacks citations, where it needs it most. I also see the complete neglect for citations in the first and second paragraphs of the function section. I definitely see the improvements that could be made on this article.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Spatial memory
 * In 2011, this article was marked for possible need of clean up. If that's still the case, this would be a strong article. There are gifs of diagrams of heads featured in the article, which is a sign of editors that took their time to add the most detailed edits to the article. I love how detailed the article gets in each section. Seems like minimal improvement could be made on this article, but still is a contender because of the note at the top of the article.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Perspective (graphical)
 * This project has been rated C-class, but includes a very long and detailed talk page, which means that a lot of care has gone Ito it, but not enough to bump it up from a c rating. The article lacks citations, which is not good, for how long and detailed this article is. I definitely see the potential to add more citations to this article.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Apperceptive agnosia
 * This article includes an alert at the heading indicating that the article needs more citations, which I agree with. There are also no visual aids featured in the article, which is a problem, so if I were to edit the article, I would have to add photos where needed. Some of the sections need a little bit more editing, since they are a bit short. This article does have a lot of work for me to do, which is tempting
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Auditory agnosia
 * This article is described as a start class article. It has no comments in the talk section, so I'm thinking one team worked on it and never used the talk section to talk to each other. Also, the article has no pictures, which isn't good at all, so pictures will need to be added. In the "Pure Word Deafness" section, there is one or two citations, which means it should be marked with more citations. The article appears to be pretty neutral, so those errors see to be evident at the moment
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources