User:Gb825/Arpilleras/Ag611232 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Gb825
 * Arpilleras

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Not really.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is not everly detailed, its a really good introduction.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?Yes I really liked the clarifications/additions you made on certain topics like the church's role in inspiring the Arpilleras
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?Nope

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. The facts you provided were pretty neutral and the sources support them
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would say that all that I read gave me sufficient information that satisfied the viewpoints I wanted to see.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No,not all of it.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they do.
 * Are the sources current? Most of them are.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?Yes I really liked the organization of this particular wikipedia article.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? NO
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?