User:Gcecchi2/Ban Kao Archaeological Site/Ibell3772 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gcecchi2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Gcecchi2/Ban Kao Archaeological Site


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead seems like a good introduction to the article, and has a good introductory sentence. I think it might help to add some more details, like a description of the site and its significance. There isn't any content for the article body, but the content in the lead is relevant to the article topic and up to date. The intro is also written in a neutral tone. The source seems like a good overview of the site, and is from a good and reliable source. It is from 1968 though, so it isn't very up to date and there has probably been some research done related to the site since then. If there are any other sources, it would also be good to put them on the wikipedia bibliography page, because I can only see the one source that was cited in the intro. The writing and organization of the content seems good. There is some really minor syntax stuff, like maybe taking out the comma in the second sentence. The article isn't backed up by very many sources, but it does link back to a couple other articles so that's good. Overall, I don't really see any issues with the page so far, other than the amount of content that's been written. I think it has a good intro sentence, but the rest of the article needs to get filled out more. I think it would also be good to get the other sources onto the page even if you haven't cited them yet.