User:Gcmorgan/District of Columbia V. Exxon Mobil Corp/Nrmeier16 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Acruss21, Yellow78, Jerseymike7, Eman3502, Gcmorgan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gcmorgan/District_of_Columbia_V._Exxon_Mobil_Corp?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gcmorgan/District_of_Columbia_V._Exxon_Mobil_Corp?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
- ". By doing so, ExxonMobil may have made climate change worse by its actions, which could lead to problems like rising sea levels and more extreme weather" - this line presents bias

- "In the past ExxonMobil has been involved in many other high-profile oil spills, and accidents ExxonMobil has faced criticism for its handling of oil spills, including the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, which was one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history." - should you provide the link to the alaska oil spill page?

- "ExxonMobil themselves would face a great loss if the case were to be sided with the District of Columbia" - is this okay to discuss? since its in the future is it objective?

Pros:

- very informational and you have very reputable sources! Very trustworthy

- looks visually appealing

-

Cons:

- maybe add a visual aid of sorts. That helps readers become more engaged with the article.

- watch out for slight bias in the way you are describing things. Make sure its 100% objective

-