User:Gcoconnell19/Academically Talented Youth Programs/Kara0719 Peer Review

The lead is a little long and probably conveys more information than a lead should.

I would say that the lead is overly detailed (good writing, but I think some of the information belongs in more of a body paragraph)

The content added so far is relevant topic and seems like it is up to date

The content added is neural and unbiased

There should be some more sources and the sources that are included need to be in the correct format

Make sure to get many unbiased sources

If you can find a relevant image, then that would add to your presentation

Overall, I think this would be a very interesting topic and a great start it just needs more information in the body

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)