User:Gdk2000/sandbox

Article evaluation 1.) Everything in the article is relevant to the miscoduct of police officers, but they don’t not include what kind of misconduct, including the killing of dogs. 2.) the article never says it was against the police brutality, but they state all the facts making it seem as if they are against it. 3.) the viewpoints show the major part of the police misconduct but it doesn’t touch on the matter that dogs are shot everyday without the cops being investigated. 4.) the citations work, each one perfectly portraying what the word they used to cite is and the background information of it. 5.) each fact is represented with a reference to either a researched article or a book providing the facts. 6.) all of the dates seem to be in place, but there should be a section where it speaks specifically to the issue of cops shooting and killing dogs. 7.) in the talk tab, several people are talking about raising the required IQ to be a cop and for police body cameras that can record so that they can crack down on what really happen at a scene 8.) we haven’t talked about the article in class