User:Gedrickt/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ecologically sustainable development

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because ecologically sustainable development correlates to zoology in the need for protecting the environment. The whole purpose of having sustainable development is because of how mankind has treated the planet in the last few hundred years. We're trying to protect the environment and the species that reside in it because they all play a part in the ecosystem and how we as humans live. My impression before I read the article was that it was professional because it came from the "Academic disciplines" category.

Evaluate the article
The first sentence was concise and consisted of exactly what it was going to be covering. It isn't over-detailed when it talked about things like environmental degradation and ways to be sustainable. The content is relevant because it talks about ways that eco-sustainable development can be pushed. I think the UN is pushing for this development and the article talks about how political heads should think about the long-term benefits of eco-sustainable development in comparison to just a few extra $$$ they could save making complete concrete jungles. The article is split into neat sections and the next section goes into detail on what could be implemented to push eco-sustainable development. I believe this article covers the equity gaps in the third section under one of the bullet points, mentioning the "establishment of common laws for the Earth and mankind." The last time this article was updated was March of 2021, so it's fairly recent. The article appears neutral as its stand point is really talking about everyone else and how they can change the environmental issues. There does not appear to be much minority viewpoints in which I would assume would be the regular citizens other than the government as it does not really go into what I as an individual can do to help with eco-sustainable development. The article appears to have thorough sources but if you click on some of the links it shows that the page is not found, so it needs to be updated. A lot of the sources are from before the 2000s too. The article is well organized and easy to read. There are no images present. No conversations going on behind the scenes and this article has automatically remained a stub-class "because it uses a sub-category of ." it is not even a start article except for on the project's quality scale.. To be fair, I thought this article had a pretty well start, and then it started missing chunks and pieces here and there and it just didn't feel right at the end. All the questions asking me to evaluate each missing piece really helped out because I wouldn't have noticed.The article's strengths are that the info that's there appears to be accurate enough to be viable information and it serves a use for people who want to get into the topic, but it's missing information that the reader could also have purpose for, like what they can do about the matter. I'd say this article is probably 76% completed. It just needs another section and a photo that could be a company that specializes in this kind of stuff.