User:Genevieve McCann/Capezio/Jgiglio7 Peer Review

General info
Gennevive McCann
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Genevieve McCann/Capezio
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Genevive's article is informatory on the subject in which she wishes to inform her audience about the Capezio A.C.E. Awards and the history/contemporary updates to them. The lead of the article accurately describes an informational summary of what is to come in terms of the statistics following in the content. However, the lead was lacking an abundance of sustanance, it was rather surface level informatory. All of the content however was relevant to the topic, and up to date. I was happy to add a few sentences where I could to provide that additional information to the article.