User:Genieinabottle123/Vicky Chen (singer)/StephaniePaventy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Genieinabottle123)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Genieinabottle123/Vicky_Chen_%28singer%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

LEAD

Q1. Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

--> Yes!

Q2. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

--> Yes, the lead is rally good!

Q3. Yes, lots of details.

Q4. no, everything is in the article!

Q5. I don't think it's overly detailed.

Content

Q1. Yes

Q2. Yes

Q3. No, all the topics and columns matches,

Q4. No, it is nothing related to that.

Tone & Balance

No, everything is in neutral tone, this article is about a singer, it does not contains any persuade or in favor position.

Sources and References

Q1. Yes, according to the writer, every sources are translated from the original reliable source of information.

Q2. Yes, it is just translation from the original sources. Nothing that's not true was added.

Q3.?

Q4. Yes, the sources are up to date!

Q5.No, the sources do not contain anything like that.

Q6. No, the original sources are good enough.

Q7. Yes they do! The link brought me to a different language of a wiki page.

Organization

Q1. Yes! Really organized.

Q2. No, did not find any major grammatical errors.

Q3. yes, very well organized and neat.

Overall Impressions:

Q1. The overall quality looks really professional and well done.

Q2. The strengths of the content added are: well organized, well written, and no negative words or tone were included.

Q3. Nothing really needs to be improved since it is really well written. Only need to complete the entire article.