User:GeoMedrek/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Calcitonin receptor (S)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Article is poor on content amount. Two sections, introduction and Interactions. From prior research I know more content can be added.


 * Sources
 * Lot of sources for minimal information. Entire article could use a rework.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Calcium-sensing receptor (S)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Article has detailed sections but as an Interactions section that contains one sentence which can be expanded. Looking at the Talk page doesn't show any interest for it.


 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Glucagon receptor (S)


 * Article Evaluation
 * 0 information on the Talk page. This receptor unlike others, lacks a history section. I believe this is important to see as a student / researcher because it helps construct connections to other topics in the field.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * 17β-Estradiol (S)


 * Article Evaluation
 * The Talk page has been really inactive for a S graded article. It has plenty of information in it and potentially needs a regrade as I cannot see much needed areas for improvement after inspection. I initially went into this article because of the grade but as a student I don't know what much else I can contribute.


 * Sources
 * The information presented is properly sourced. Sources are recent.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Vitamin D receptor


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is most similar to how the calcitonin article is. The article features information on the function of the Vitamin D receptor and the Interactions. Compared to other receptors, this one is very pale on the details and lacks common sections like a history section regarding the discovery or the detailing of initial observation.


 * Sources