User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Guantanamo captive's habeas corpus cases/Parallel/ZaidVBush

__NOINDEX__

See User:Geo Swan/Stale drafts Zaid v. Bush (Civil Action No. 05-cv-1646 (D.D.C.)) is a writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of Guantanamo captive Waleed Said Bin Said Zaid before US District Court Judge John D. Bates.

Combatant Status Review Tribunal
Eighteen pages of unclassified documents from his Combatant Status Review Tribunal were published in response to his habeas petition.

Lead Counsel
In January 2007 the Center for Constitution Rights published a list of the counsels of the "lead petitioners" in the captives various habeas petitions. The list records Judith Brown Chomsky as the counsel to the lead petitioner on this petition.

Military Commissions Act
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.

Boumediene v. Bush
On June 12 2008 the United States Supreme Court ruled, in Boumediene v. Bush, that the Military Commissions Act could not remove the right for Guantanamo captives to access the US Federal Court system. And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated. The judges considering the captives' habeas petitions would be considering whether the evidence used to compile the allegations the men and boys were enemy combatants justified a classification of "enemy combatant".

Re-initiation
On 15 July 2008 Kristine A. Huskey filed a "NOTICE OF PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR 30-DAYS NOTICE OF TRANSFER" on behalf of several dozen captives. The petition would prevent the Department of Defense from transferring him out of US jurisdiction without giving his attorney's thirty days notice. The Department of Defense had transferred some captives to countries where they were subsequently subjected to abusive treatment -- even though they had active habeas corpus petitions.

On 19 July 2008 Judith Brown Chomsky filed a status report on behalf of Waleed Said Bin Said Zaid. In her report Chomsky stated his petition was first filed on 16 August 2005. She reported that the United States Department of Justice filed an incomplete and redacted factual return 22 February 2006. She reported that a DTA appeal under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 had been filed, Zaid v. Gates (Civil Action No. 07-1131) on 26 April 2007.

On 26 November 2008 Judith Chomsky filed a "PETITIONER’S OPPOSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S NOVEMBER 6, 2008 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDED ORDER" with regard to Waleed Said Bn Said Zaid (ISN 550) in Civil Action No. 05-cv-1646 (JDB).

On 15 December 2008 DoJ official Steve Matheny filed a "Unopposed motion to file unclassified return out of time and notice of filing protected information" in Civil Action No. 05-cv-1646, 05-cv-2378 (JDB).

More
http://humanrights.ucdavis.edu/projects/the-guantanamo-testimonials-project/testimonies/testimonies-of-the-defense-department/scheduling_order_20080711.pdf

ecf dcd
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-397 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-337 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-420 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-377 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-348 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0828-412 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2008cv1805-16 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2005cv1646-81 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2005cv1646-96 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2005cv1646-72

Pegc

 * http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo_II/order_TFH_20080919.pdf
 * http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo_II/gov_not_20081027.pdf
 * http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo_II/gov_mot_20081031.pdf
 * http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo_II/order_TFH_20081107.pdf

Scotusblog

 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/hogan-sched-order-7-11-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/us-prop-case-order-7-25-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/us-motion-for-partial-relief-8-29-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/us-response-on-detainee-delay-9-15-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/hogan-order-9-19-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/hogan-opinioin-9-19-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hogan-case-mng-order-11-6-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/us-proposed-order-11-18-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hogan-stay-order-11-21-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hogan-cmo-order-12-16-08.pdf
 * http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hogan-consol-order-12-17-08.pdf

Justia

 * 1) 1
 * 2) 5
 * 3) 32
 * 4) 39
 * 5) 41
 * 6) 63
 * 7) 89
 * 8) 466
 * 9) 546
 * 10) 598
 * 11) 600
 * 12) 723
 * 13) 808
 * 14) 887
 * 15) 890
 * 16) 891
 * 17) 917
 * 18) 952
 * 19) 1064
 * 20) 1156
 * 21) 1157
 * 22) 1291
 * 23) 1293
 * 24) 1297
 * 25) 1299
 * 26) 1300
 * 27) 1306
 * 28) 1308
 * 29) 1431
 * 30) 1444