User:Geofferic/Archive/Talk/25 1 2011

25 1 2011
I think the red problem is like the underlining problem I was seeing earlier, and I think its something specific to the transclusion earlier this morning. Syrthiss (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Replied and small sig concern
Hi Geofferic, just wanted to put a note on your page here to let you know I replied at my page. I know you've been registered for a long time, but don't know how familiar you are with people's talkpage idiosyncrasies.

Also, while I don't personally care... you might want to see if you can simplify your signature. It looked 'pretty long' when I was editing my talk page, and long sigs when viewed in the edit window can annoy some people. If you want to go about that and want advice, I can point you to a couple people who tend to be good at alternative coding that may still achieve the desired look. Syrthiss (talk) 12:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I've shrunk the sig down three times now, and I would *love* help shrinking it some more. Thanks!  Geofferic   T•C ✡  15:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok, lemme ping User:Xeno and see if can take a look. Syrthiss (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

see if [] is more to your liking. Xeno and Amalthea had a hand at it. Syrthiss (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The visual difference is so minor, I doubt many people would even notice. DEFINITELY worth cutting an entire line out of the sig's code.  THANKS!  I will go thank them, too! Geofferic   T•C ✡  14:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Of course, making everything after it red is a bit odd. I can't see what's doing this in the sig. Geofferic   T•C ✡  15:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)