User:Georgcortes/Robert Stiegler/Livmeyer Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Georgecortes
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Robert Stiegler

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, it encapsulated the information contained in this section
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it summarized the points being made well.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Not quite, although it did summarize topics discussed in the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all topics are elaborated on in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the discussion of his early career and life make sense.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Most of the sources are fairly recent, and at least from this century.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I feel all content belongs, however I wish more information was included about his style of work.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it is written in an unbiased manner.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not that I noticed.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I don't think any distinct viewpoints were presented in this article.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it does not.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The first sentence in the biography section did not have a citation.there also isn't a source directly attached to the statement that he was a professor. Much of the film career section also lack citation.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The article contained a variety of sources that all seem comprehensive of the information avaliable.
 * Are the sources current? Yes most are written at least within the last 20 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? I checked several links snd they all worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is all grammatically correct and easy to understand.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? This article is well written and doesn't have any errors I noticed.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes this article is concisely organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, adding images may be helpful.
 * Are images well-captioned? Images are not included.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes the article contains several sources that backed up claims made.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? From the limited research I did I understood these sourcing to encapsulate the avaliable info on this artist.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes, biography and places his work has been shown are all relevant and in line with other articles
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, several other articles are included.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, this article seems to paint a fairly full picture of the artist's life and work. I think if more is added about style and long lasting legacy it will be complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I think added content created a fuller picture of his teaching career.
 * How can the content added be improved? Containing more complete, longer statements.