User:GeorgeMandelYale/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

A.C.A.B.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because of its current relevance. It matters because it concerns the issue of police reform, which interests millions of people worldwide. My preliminary impression is that the article is good.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead

 * The lead contains an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The lead does not contain a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * The lead does not contain information that is not present in the article.
 * The lead is concise.

Content

 * The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * The content is up-to-date.
 * There is no content missing nor content that does not belong.
 * The article does address topics related to historically underrepresented populations and topics.

Tone and Balance

 * The article is from a neutral point of view.
 * There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
 * In my view, the use of the term ACAB by those who oppose the police is underrepresented in the article.
 * Fringe viewpoints are accurately described as such.
 * The article does not attempt to persuade the reader.

Images and Media

 * The images included in the article enhance understanding of the topic.
 * The images are well-captioned.

Organization and writing quality

 * The article is well-written.
 * The article is well-organized.