User:Geraldshields11/sandbox/lapelpin

It seems IP user 94.189.211.110, on 12:12, 17 October 2012‎, scooped The Daily Mail 30 October 2012 article about the lapel pin issue. The IP user's edit looked to specific. I agree with the reason for the revert because unsoursed material about a living person is questionable. On 30 October 2012, when I found a cite to partialy support the text about disipline, I was supprised. That is why I asked, in the edit summary, fellow editors to look at my edit and the cite. Then, I found another NPOV third party cite, dated 30 October 2012, to directly support the edit about disipline concerning a lapel pin. I suggest the IP user get some wikilove for the scoop and a primer on how to properly source and cite edits. What do you think?