User:Gerhardvalentin/Two envelopes problem/sources

The following is a list of sources, ordered chronologically, that discuss the well-known Two envelopes problem.

== 1943 ==
 * Maurice Kraitchik, Mathematical Recreations, George Allen & Unwin, London. (2nd edition, 1953, Dover publications, New York).

== 1953 ==
 * J.E. Littlewood, A Mathematician's Miscellany, Methuen & Co, London.

== 1982 ==
 * Martin Gardner, Aha! Gotcha: Paradoxes to Puzzle and Delight, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, p 106.

== 1987 ==
 * Carlos Rodriguez, Understanding Ignorance, Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, pages 189–204. G Erickson and C R Smith (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 * Thomas M Cover, Pick the largest number, Open Problems in Communication and Computation, T Cover and B Gopinath, eds., Springer Verlag, p 152.
 * Laurence McGilvery, 'Speaking of Paradoxes . . .' or Are We?, Journal of Recreational Mathematics 19: 15-19.

== 1988 ==
 * Sandy Zabell, Loss and gain: the exchange paradox, J M Bernardo, M H DeGroot, D V Lindley, and A F M. Smith, editors, Bayesian statistics 3, Proceedings of the third Valencia international meeting, pages 233–236. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 * Sandy Zabell, Symmetry and and Its Discontents, Brian Skyrms, William Harper, editors, Causation, Chance, and Credence: Proceedings from the Irvine Conference on Probability and Causation, Volume 1, pages 155-190. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
 * Randall Barron, The paradox of the money pump: a resolution, Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, ed J Skilling.
 * Barry Nalebuff, Puzzles: Cider in Your Ear, Continuing Dilemma, The Last Shall Be First, and More, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 149-156.

== 1989 ==
 * Barry Nalebuff, Puzzles: The Other Person’s Envelope is Always Greener, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(1): 171–181.
 * Martin Gardner, Penrose Tiles to Trapdoor Ciphers and the Return of Dr Matrix, The Mathematical Association of America, W H Freeman, New York, p 148.

== 1990 ==
 * R. Guy, Where the Grass is Greener, contributed to column Flaws, Fallacies and Flimflam, College Mathematics Journal, January, p. 35.

== 1991 ==
 * Christensen and Utts, Bayesian Resolution of Classical Paradoxes: Two Examples, Technical Report 220, University of California, Davis, Division of Statistics.

== 1992 ==
 * Ronald Christensen, Jessica Utts, Bayesian Resolution of the 'Exchange Paradox', The American Statistician 46(4): 274–76.
 * Raymond Smullyan, Satan, Cantor, and Inﬁnity Alfred A. Knopf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 * David J. Chalmers, The Two-Envelope Paradox: A Complete Analysis?, published online [html ]
 * James Cargile, On a Problem about Probability and Decision, Analysis, 52(4): 211-16.
 * Ruma Falk and Clifford Konold, The Psychology of Learning Probability, pp. 151-164 in F.S. and S.P. Gordon (eds), Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, The Mathematical Association of America.

== 1993 ==
 * David A Binder, Comment on Christensen and Utts (1992), The Amercian Statistician 47(2): 160.
 * Ronald Christensen, Jessica Utts, Reply to Binder, The American Statistician 47(2): 160.
 * Terry Ridgway, Comment on Christensen and Utts (1992), The American Statistician 47(4): 311.
 * Ronald Christensen, Jessica Utts, Reply to Ridgway, The American Statistician 47(4): 311.
 * Paul Anand, The Philosophy of Intransitive Preference, The Economic Journal 103(417): 337-346. [jstor ]

== 1994 ==
 * Jordan Howard Sobel, Two Envelopes, Theory and Decision, 36: 69–96.
 * Frank Jackson, Peter Menzies, Graham Oppy, The Two Envelope 'Paradox', Analysis 54(1): 43–45.
 * Paul Castell, Diderik Batens, The Two Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case, Analysis 54(1): 46–49.
 * Piers Rawling. A note on the two envelopes problem Theory and Decision 36(1): 97-102.
 * Elliot Linzer, The Two Envelope Paradox, The American Mathematical Monthly 101(5): 417-419.
 * Sheldon M Ross, Comment on Christensen and Utts (1992), The American Statistician 48(3): 267.
 * Ronald Christensen, Jessica Utts, Reply to Ross, The American Statistician 48(3): 268.

== 1995 ==
 * John Broome, The Two-envelope Paradox, Analysis 55: 6–11.
 * Charles Chihara, The Mystery of Julius: A Paradox in Decision Theory Philosophical Studies 80: 1–16.
 * S J Brams, D M Kilgour, The box problem: To switch or not to switch Mathematics Magazine 68: 27–34.
 * Kyung Chae, A resolution of the ’exchange paradox’, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 26(4): 553-558.

== 1996 ==
 * Nelson M Blachman, Ronald Christensen, Jessica Utts and David J Finney, Comment on Christensen and Utts, Bayesian resolution of the ‘Exchange Paradox’(1992), The American Statistician 50(1): 98–99 [jstor ]
 * F T Bruss, The Fallacy of the Two Envelopes Problem, The Mathematical Scientist 21(2): 112–119.

== 1997 ==
 * McGrew, Shier, Silverstein, The Two-Envelope Paradox Resolved Analysis 57(1): 28–33.
 * Alexander D Scott, Michael Scott, What’s in the Two Envelope Paradox? Analysis 57(1): 34–41.
 * Frank Arntzenius, David McCarthy, The two envelope paradox and infinite expectations, Analysis 57(1): 42–50.
 * Piers Rawling, Perspectives on a pair of envelopes, Theory and Decision 43: 253–277.
 * K G Merryﬁeld, N Viet, S Watson, The Wallet Paradox Amer. Math. Monthly 104(7): 647-649.
 * Raymond Smullyan, The Riddle of Scheherazade, and Other Amazing Puzzles, Ancient and Modern Knopf, New York.

== 1998 ==
 * John D Norton, When the sum of our expectations fails us: The exchange paradox Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 34–58. [pdf ]
 * S J Brams, D M Kilgour, The fallacy of the two envelopes problem, Mathematical Scientist 23: 58–59.

== 1999 ==
 * Carl G Wagner, Misadventures in conditional expectation: The two-envelope problem, Erkenntnis 51: 233–241.

== 2000 ==
 * M Clark, N Shackel, The Two-Envelope Paradox, Mind 109(435): 415–442.
 * Wilfried Hausmann, On The Two Envelope Paradox, unpublished?
 * Terry Horgan, The Two-Envelope Paradox, Nonstandard Expected Utility, and the Intensionality of Probability, Noûs 34(4): 578-603.
 * Z Schuss, To switch or not to switch, this is the question!, unpublished.
 * Ian Stewart, Mathematical Recreations: Paradox Lost Scientiﬁc American 6: 88–89.
 * Christopher M. Langan, Paradox Resolved: The Kraitchik and 2-Envelopes Paradoxes, unpublished [html ]

== 2001 ==
 * Olav Gjelsvik, Can Two Envelopes Shake The Foundations of Decision Theory?, unpublished?
 * Terry Horgan, The Two-Envelope Paradox and the Foundations of Rational Decision Theory, unpublished.
 * N M Blachman, D M Kilgour, Elusive optimality in the box problem, Mathematics Magazine 74: 171-181.
 * Peter Winkler, Murray Hill, Games people don't play, Puzzlers' Tribute, David Wolfe and Tom Rodgers (eds), A K Peters Ltd.

== 2002 ==
 * Jeff Speaks, The two-envelope paradox and inference from an unknown, unpublished?
 * David Chalmers, The St. Petersburg Two-Envelope Paradox, Analysis 62(2): 155-57.
 * James Chase, The Non-Probabilistic Two Envelope Paradox, Analysis 62(2): 157–60.
 * Aaron S Edlin, Forward Discount Bias, Nalebuff’s Envelope Puzzle, and the Siegel Paradox in Foreign Exchange, Topics in Theoretical Economics 2(1).
 * Olav Gjelsvik, Paradox lost, but in which envelope? Croatian Journal of Philosophy II(6): 353–62.

== 2003 ==
 * Friedel Bolle, The Envelope Paradox, the Siegel Paradox, and the Impossibility of Random Walks in Equity and Financial Markets, unpublished?
 * Graham Priest, Greg Restall, Envelopes and Indifference, published online [pdf ]
 * Casper Albers, Trying to resolve the two-envelope problem, Chapter 2 of his thesis Distributional Inference: The Limits of Reason, March 2003. (Has also appeared as Albers, Casper J.; Kooi, Barteld P. and Schaafsma, Willem (2005), Trying to resolve the two-envelope problem, Synthese, 145(1): 89–109)
 * Gary Malinas, "Two envelope problems and the roles of ignorance, Acta Analytica 18(30/31): 217–225.
 * C J G Meacham, J Weisberg, Clark and Shackel on the Two-Envelope Paradox, Mind 112(448): 685-689.
 * Michael Clark, Nicholas Shackel, Decision Theory, Symmetry and Causal Structure: Reply to Meacham and Weisberg, Mind 112(448): 691-701.
 * Terry Horgan, The Two-Envelope Paradox and the Foundations of Rational Decision Theory, unpublished [html ]
 * Frank Arntzenius, Adam Elga, John Hawthorne, Bayesianism, Infinite Decisions, and Binding, unpublished draft [pdf ]

== 2004 ==
 * Eric Schwitzgebel, Josh Dever, Using Variables Within the Expectation Formula, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 * Dov Samet, Iddo Samet, David Schmeidler, One Observation behind Two-Envelope Puzzles, The American Mathematical Monthly 111(4): 347–51. [abstract ]
 * R Jeffrey, Subjective probability: The real thing, Cambridge University Press.
 * Bruce Langtry. The Classical and Maximin Versions of the Two-Envelope Paradox, Australasian Journal of Logic 2: 30–43.
 * Robert A. Agnew, "On the Two-Box Paradox", Mathematics Magazine 77(4): 302–308. [pdf ]
 * Keith Devlin, The Two Envelopes Paradox, published online [html ]
 * Brian Weatherson, How Surprising is the Two Envelope Paradox, unpublished [html ]
 * Tom Loredo, The Two-Envelope Paradox, unpublished.

== 2005 ==
 * Jan Poland, The Two Envelopes Paradox in a Short Story, unpublished.
 * C J Albers, B P Kooi, W Schaafsma, Trying to resolve the two-envelope problem, Synthese 145: 89–109.
 * Franz Dietrich, Christian List, The Two-Envelope Paradox: An Axiomatic Approach, Mind 114(454): 239-248.
 * Richard Harter, The two envelopes puzzle, unpublished [html ]
 * Amos Storkey, Money Trouble and Money Trouble – Solution, unpublished.
 * P Rawling, A note on the two envelopes problem, Theory and Decision 36(1): 97-102.
 * Ned Markosian, A simple solution to the two-envelope problem, unpublished.

== 2006 ==
 * Rich Turner and Tom Quilter, The Two Envelopes Problem, published online [pdf ].
 * Adom Giffin, The Error in the Two Envelope Paradox, arXiv:physics/0608172v1
 * Raymond Nickerson and Ruma Falk, The exchange paradox: Probabilistic and cognitive analysis of a psychological conundrum, Thinking & Reasoning 12(2): 181–213.
 * Dennis V Lindley, Understanding Uncertainty, Wiley, NY.
 * D R Cox, Principles of Statistical Inference, Cambridge University Press.
 * Eric Schwitzgebel and Josh Dever, The Two Envelope Paradox and Using Variables Within the Expectation Formula, Department of Philosophy, UC Riverside, published online [pdf ].
 * Randall Barron, Continuous Version of the Two Envelopes Puzzle, published online [pdf ]
 * John Kay, Don’t box yourself in when making decisions, Financial Times, August 22.
 * Graham Oppy, Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity, Cambridge University Press, pp 185-194.

== 2007 ==
 * Jeff Chen, The Puzzle of the Two-Envelope Puzzle—a Logical Approach, published online [abstract ]
 * Bernard D Katz, Doris Olin, A Tale of Two Envelopes, Mind 116(464): 903-926.
 * Igor Douven, A Three-step Solution to the Two-envelope Paradox, Logique et Analyse 50(200) [pdf ]
 * Aris Spanos, The Exchange (or Two Envelope) Paradox Revisited, published online.
 * Moshe Sniedovich, The Two-Envelope Paradox: A Primer for Dummies, unpublished draft.
 * Peter Olofsson, Probabilities: the little numbers that rule our lives, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pages 129-132.

== 2008 ==
 * Ruma Falk, The Unrelenting Exchange Paradox, Teaching Statistics 30(3): 86-88.
 * Susan F Butler, Raymond S Nickerson, Keep or Trade? An Experimental Study of the Exchange Paradox, Thinking and Reasoning 14(4): 365–394.
 * Eric Schwitzgebel, Josh Dever, The Two Envelope Paradox and Using Variables Within the Expectation Formula, Sorites 20: 135-140 [pdf ].
 * Graham Priest, Greg Restall, Envelopes and indifference, C Dégremont, L Keiff, H Rückert (eds.), Dialogues, Logics and Other Strange Things: Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman, London: College Publications, 277-284 [pdf ].

== 2009 ==
 * Mark D McDonnell, Derek Abbott, Randomized switching in the two-envelope problem, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 465: 3309–3322. [abstract ]
 * Don Fallis, Taking the Two Envelope Paradox to the Limit, Southwest Philosophy Review 25(2). [abstract ]
 * Byeong-Uk Yi, The Two-envelope Paradox With No Probability, unpublished draft [pdf ]
 * Melinda Roberts, The Nonidentity Problem and the Two Envelope Problem: When is One Act Better for a Person than Another? Chapter 10 of M A Roberts, D T Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons, International Library 201 of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 35.
 * Tad Boniecki, Two Envelope Paradox Solution, unpublished [html ]
 * Ruma Falk, Raymond Nickerson, An inside look at the two envelopes paradox, Teaching Statistics 31(2): 39-41.

== 2010 ==
 * Peter A. Sutton, The Epoch of Incredulity: A Response to Katz and Olin’s ‘A Tale of Two Envelopes’ Mind 119(473): 159-169.
 * Bernard D Katz, Doris Olin, Conditionals, Probabilities, and Utilities: More on Two Envelopes Mind 119(473): 172-183.
 * Federico O’Reilly, Is there a two-envelope paradox?, published online [pdf ]
 * Paul Syverson, Opening Two Envelopes, Acta Analytica 25:479–498.
 * Martin C. Cooke, Two Envelopes, two paradoxes, The Reasoner 4(5): 74 - 75 [pdf ]
 * Derek Abbott, Bruce R Davis, The two-envelope problem revisited, Fluctuation and Noise Letters 9(1): 1–8.
 * Jeremy Gwiazda, Repeated St Petersburg two-envelope trials and expected value, unpublished draft.

== 2011 ==
 * Mark D McDonnell, Alex J Grant, Ingmar Land, Badri N Vellambi, Derek Abbott, Ken Lever, Gain from the two-envelope problem via information asymmetry: on the suboptimality of randomized switching, Proceedings of the Royal Society.
 * Richard D Gill, Anna Karenina and The Two Envelopes Problem, unpublished draft [pdf ]

(Category:Decision theory paradoxes)

-