User:GersonCool/Lifelong learning/Dcclemen Peer Review

General info
(GersonCool)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:GersonCool/Lifelong learning
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lifelong learning:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Everything in this planned changes appear to be relevant to the article topic.

The article and changes do come off in a neutral tone and factually based.

I would say the lack of sources leaves these changes as underrepresented but your plans to find more sources would remedy this issue for me.

The citations used do work correctly in your drafts and seem to support your claims.

Just spend more time finding relevant sources and adding them to your sandbox.

Nothing seems to be missing just find more sources