User:Ghirardellyz/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Abortion and mental health
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article considering that at this time this is a very controversial topic. Women are suffering and being mistreated, and men do not suffer the necessary consequences. Due to this, women's mental health is being drastically affected.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead does have accuracy at presenting the information, it is very clear and precise. The major points are detailed as supposed, making it easier for the reader's attention. The Lead does not include information that is not presented in the article, unlike, it overly details at some points. This makes the lead look a bit overworked but understandable because of all the information needed to discuss this topic.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The abundance of information makes the article a relevant one, it grabs the reader's attention easily. Even though this is not up-to-date it is a topic that has been very controversial since ever because of all the situations women has passed through due to the abuse they receive. It is never enough when writing about a topic that to this date has been very debatable, it is very helpful for those who have passed through abuse.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
This article is not neutral because it appears to be very specific, with abundant information which catches the reader's attention. There are some points that are overrepresented, much information was written which can alarm heavily the ones who read it. It does attempt to persuade the reader that women suffer from depression more often when they do not abort and keep the creature in their life, than when they abort.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The majority of the facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. These sources reflect the literature on the topic, it gives us extra information for us to have a better understanding of the topic. All of the links work effectively, letting us know that the information given is reliable with the topic.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
This article is clear, very understandable and easy to read, even though there are a few spelling errors. It is well-organized and the sections are well differentiated, very precise and with the information required. Those sections help in the organization, and makes it look well-developed and neat.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
Although this article does not present images that enhances understanding, it emphasizes very specifically in the given information.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
This topic is a very relevant and controversial one, behind the scenes what is being said is that abortion occurs when it is an unwanted creature, but on what people do not emphasize is on the idea that some creatures are born with specific necessities that parents can not lead with. It differs from what is talked generally because of the point it leans on.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
The article's overall status is to maintain people informed that when the abortion does not occur when wanted they get a higher chance of being in depression because of the situations they pass through with the creature in the future. The article strengths are the points given to make people analyze the abortion and depression circumstances. This can be improved by writing of different cases and outcomes when people do and do not practice abortion. This is a well-developed article with strong points which are well placed and discussed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: