User:Ghirardellyz/Vegan design/Yairelizvg Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Ghirardellyz (https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Ghirardellyz)
 * Link to draft: User:Ghirardellyz/Vegan design

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The article heading contains an introductory sentence that clearly says what the article is about. I realized that my peer has not worked on the sandbox of the article, it is exactly the same as the original.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
On the content, the article is not so extensive and being an interesting topic I think it may have more information. I recommend to add information about how vegan design started and why, maybe its benefits, companies that work with vegan design, etc.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the article is neutral, which is good. So, make sure that when you add more information it stay like that.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Like I said, the article in the sandbox do not have new information. But, there are some references in the original article, they were all recovered in 2019, so they may be recent. I also checked some links and they worked fine.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is very concise and easy to understand, but it can be better as you add more information. It is not broken down into sections. But, if you take in consideration adding information about how the vegan desing stared, where, why, or more about exhibitions, you can create sections. So, it could be easier to look for the information. Also, the article grammar is great and do not have spellings errors.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The original article only has one image, so if you can add more about vegan clothing pieces it would be great.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The article itself seems interesting to me, since I did not have much knowledge on that subject. That is why I suggest you add information that I already mentioned, for those who do not know about this. I hope you start working on it soon, and I can wait to read the final result.