User:Giggles5858/Queen bee acid/Knm027 Peer Review

Lead

Guiding questions:

·       Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead has not been updated.

·       Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article’s topic? Yes

·       Does the Lead include a brief description of the article’s major sections? There is only one major section so yes.

·       Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No

·       Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes

·       Is the content added up-to-date? Yes

·       Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The content belongs

'''·       Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia’s equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?''' N/A

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added neutral? Yes

·       Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The claims are not biased

·       Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No

·       Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

·       Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The source isn't bad, but using a scientific paper would be better if you could find one.

'''·       Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You’ll need to refer to the sources to check this.)''' Yes

·       Are the sources thorough -i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Using a scientific paper would better reflect the available literature on this topic

·       Are the sources current? Yes

'''·       Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?''' N/A

'''·       Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)'''

'''·       Check a few links. Do they work?''' The link to the source does work. However, the source should not be put in as a link, it should be put in using the cite button.

Organization

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added well-written -i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes

·       Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Royal jelly acid may cause allergic reactions in some which include hives, difficulty breathing; facial swelling in lips, tongue, or throat, It may even cause stomach pain, bloody diarrhea, irritation and itching, and bronchospasm; wheezing and chest tightness. Period after 'some' and replace 'which' with 'this'. Period after 'throat'. You could link to the wikipedia article for bronchospasm instead of explaining it.

·       Is the content added well-organized -i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media N/A

·       Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

·       Are images well-captioned?

·       Do all images adhere to Wikipedia’s copyright regulations?

·       Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

·       Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article -i.e. is the article more complete? Yes the content added improves the article

·       What are the strengths of the content added? Someone reading this article should know the possible side effects or allergic reactions the acid could cause.

·       How can the content added by improved? Just the citation and the grammar errors. Keep on adding a few more things if you can! Also, please put your edits into your own sandbox, not onto the actual article.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Giggles5858 and Littlefix21


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Queen bee acid


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Queen bee acid

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)