User:Gilldavid/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: High-mountain tea
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. High-mountain tea was discussed in class, and the article seemed interesting to evaluate.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, it does not.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, it does. The lead includes taste, but not is included in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise.

Lead evaluation
The lead is informative, yet it could be added to.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it deals with tea.
 * Is the content up-to-date? It appears to be with the last update being in July of 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is a bunch of content missing, it is a stub, and it needs more citations.

Content evaluation
The content of the article is severely lacking. It needs more updates.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? It appears to be as there is no real form of opinion.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I do not see any bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There is a lack of viewpoints to be under or overrepresented.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Tone and balance evaluation
I believe the article is neutral and provides unbiased information.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not really, there is more need for citation.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources seem to be relevant to the article, but there could be more.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation
There are good citations and sources, but there is a need for more.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The article seems to be easy to read, and it is concise.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? There does not appear to be any error.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? There is only one major section, but there could be more.

Organization evaluation
The organization is pretty well.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are a couple of pictures that are helpful, but there could be more.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Images and media evaluation
I enjoyed the two pictures available, but I would prefer to be more.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There seems to be no conversation.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated low-importance. It is a part of Food and Drink/Beverages project as well as the Taiwan project.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There is little to no difference.

Talk page evaluation
There was no activity on the Talk page.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It is a stub.
 * What are the article's strengths? Concision.
 * How can the article be improved? More information can be provided.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is incomplete and underdeveloped.

Overall evaluation
Overall, it has potential, but it needs to be added to.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: