User:Gimme a reason to keep this

NOTE: In response to feedback regarding the username, I shall be retiring this account after exactly 21 more prods. If you care, watch this page for my new nom de plume.

 

 

Gimme your feedback
(THANK YOU to Ambi, TML1988 and FCYTravis for your feedback.)
 * Gimme any advice to improve my accuracy (see right)
 * Click here to leave me a message

This user account is a sockpuppet of a known wikipedian. It exists so this one person can segregate contributions and protect the person's anonymity. Being a sockpuppet, it cannot participate in AfD.

Articles this account has proposed for deletion are listed here. This account shall stop contributing once its puppeteer is revealed.

Gimme more to read
(*Check the discussion pages out, too.)
 * Exclusionism
 * Exclusionism
 * Exclusionist
 * Deletionism
 * Deletionism
 * Deletionist
 * Association of Deletionist Wikipedians
 * Deletion policy and deletion reform
 * Deletion policy (talk)
 * Guide to deletion (talk)
 * Deletion reform (talk)
 * Proposed deletion (talk)
 * Experimental Deletion (talk)
 * Pure wiki deletion system (talk)
 * See also
 * WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
 * WikiProject Wikipedians for encyclopedic merit

Gimme some quotes for inspiration
(copied from Association of Deletionist Wikipedians)
 * Wikipedia is not a junkyard, counter to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper. --Improv 06:05, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not /dev/null UninvitedCompany 20:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * The proliferation of mediocrity is never its own excuse, and the absence of good information does not obviate the need for that information. Geogre 16:55, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not Google JFW T@lk  20:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Single-sentence "substubs" do not an encyclopedia entry make. Or, if you prefer, substubs suck.  Mediocrity should not be tolerated! - Lucky 6.9 05:51, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Roses are red/violets are blue/in Soviet Wikipedia/bad article delete you. --Slowking Man
 * Wikipedia is and will always be an encyclopedia. [...] It is not a general base of knowledge. - Anthony DiPierro
 * Verifiable != Enyclopedic Johnleemk 12:54, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Inclusionism is the easy option. Elf-friend 20:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not toilet paper, as opposed to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper. 165.21.154.111 08:23, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * If in doubt, delete. Erwin Walsh
 * Brevity is the soul of wit. HatTrick
 * Wikipedia is not a dumpster &mdash;attr. Viajero
 * Better Wikipedia articles through deletionism? You bet your sweet ass.  Deiz 14:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Gimme your location

 * Category:Wikipedia maintenance
 * Dead-end pages, Orphaned Articles, Category:Suspected hoax articles, Category:Possible copyright violations, Category:Articles lacking sources, Category:Articles which may be unencyclopedic, Category:Articles which may contain original research, Category:Biographies without real biographical information, Category:Wikipedia articles needing context, Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification, Category:Wikipedia articles that need their importance to be explained, Category:Articles which may be biased, Category:Requested moves, Category:Wikipedia cleanup, Category:XD


 * Special:Specialpages
 * Special:Allpages, Special:Newpages - don't bite!, Special:Shortpages, Special:Lonelypages, Special:Ancientpages, Special:Uncategorizedpages, Special:Deadendpages


 * Categories of topics with notability criteria
 * Category:Companies/Category:Company stubs/Category:Lists of companies
 * Category:Music/Category:Music stubs
 * Category:People/Category:People stubs/Category:Lists of people
 * Category:Software/Category:Software stubs/Category:Lists of software
 * Category:Songs/Category:Song stubs/Category:Lists of songs
 * Category:Lists of television series episodes
 * Category:Websites/Category:Website stubs