User:GirlBoss14/Women's medicine in antiquity/Javasmells2000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? GirlBoss14
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Women's medicine in antiquity

Lead
The lead has not been updates to reflect new content, so I recommend writing a sentence about Soranus and his work. The lead does include an introductory sentence that is clear about the article topic. After reading the lead, I would add a few more brief descriptions about the major sections listed in the table of contents. Overall, I think the lead is well written and concise, just incomplete. I think by adding brief sentences about birth control, labor and delivery, and caesarean section then the lead will be complete.

Content
Content is relevant to topic and covers a full spectrum of sub-topics. I think the content you have added has provided useful additional information. I do feel that under "Pregnancy" there is information about abortion that would be better suited in the section "Birth Control an Abortions." To replace this information perhaps you could find sources pertaining to infertility. This topic does represent a historically underrepresented population because there is little developed information about women during the Classical Antiquity.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

You did a great job keeping the content added neutral. I did not read any claims that were biased towards one positions, and sources were provided for facts mentioned. This article does a great job at presenting the facts and avoiding opinions. While reading, I did not feel as though the content was trying to persuade me to a specific position.

Sources and References
All new content added was backed up by a reliable secondary source. I might look into adding a re-used citation after new content added. The citations added work and send the reader directly to the source. Sources added were written within the last 30 years, and I would consider them current because of the period we are researching. Not all sources work. Most sources are books that do not have a direct link, but by clinking on a few links they sent me to websites that no longer exist. The sources show a diverse spectrum of authors, and does include some historically marginalized individuals.

Organization
The content added is concise, clear, and easy to read. In the content added, I would fix the infinitive "in order to block," because it makes the sentence grammatically correct. There is only one spelling mistake I found, so I would fix "Cyreniac juice" to be "Cyrenaic juice." Overall, the content is well organized.

Images and Media
No media was added, and I would not find it necessary to add media to the newly added content.

For New Articles Only
The draft is a previously established article.

Overall impressions
By adding additional information about Soranus the article feels more complete. A strength I found in the content added was that it provided more information about birth control used during the Classical Antiquity. It also provided information regarding physicians theories about fertilization. I think the content added was useful. Improvements could be made through the structure of the content. I would also add information to the lead to reflect the new content added.