User:Giselleee16/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Truth condition
 * It was the first article listed and it was interesting to me.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the articles topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No the lead does not include a description of the major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it does not.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes the content is relevant to the topic
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the last edit was September of 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is content that is missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it does not.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources aren't accessible.
 * Are the sources current? The sources are not current the last one is from 2013.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No the links do not work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The article is short so it is easy to read however it is not organized.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No there are only three paragraphs.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No there are no images.
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? In the talk page people discuss what changes could be done to the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated a start-class, and is part of wiki projects philosophy.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We haven't talked about this in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The article is not well developed. It needs more information and reliable resources that can be accessed.
 * What are the article's strengths? The article has good examples.
 * How can the article be improved? By including reliable resources that could be accessed and way more information on the topic.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: