User:Gizelleg25/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
As Above, So Below

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because of my love of horror movies. When I first watched the film it made me want to check out the place myself (the tourist part, not the illegal dangerous part).

Evaluate the article
The beginning paragraph seems clean and precise to the topic. It gives a brief description of the film and also facts about the film's inspiration as well as box office value. There did not seem to be any useless information added to the beginning.

I feel that the plot portion is a tad too detailed and long and would be considered too much of a spoiler for those who have not seen it. Some of the sentences also seem to be incomplete or ungrammatical. I usually do not read much into movie articles on Wiki but from what I am reading, the literal whole movie is describes scene by scene. The cast portion does seem relevant and accurate. In the filming portion there does seem to be a good amount of useful or important facts about the filming process.

All of the links and references seem to be working. At first there was a link that I was questioning that had "crimsons peak" to it but once clicking into the page I realized that there was also information about the movie AASB in that short article. There also is added links towards that bottom that provide ratings for the film which is also helpful for the movie critic.

As I have mentioned before the portion that really bugs me is the plot. The way it was written seems as if you are trying to explain the film to a friend. People do not go to wikipedia to read as if they were chatting with friends, they want a clean and speedy summary of the film. The writer should have also Italicized some phrases from the film in addition to their added quotes such as "abandon all hope, ye who enter here".

For the image and media portion there was not much added. The only photo added was the cover of the film. There should have been images added such as the stone that was the main point of the plot (to obtain it). I am not too sure if they have the correct copyright in adding the image.

In the talk page there only seems to be two negative additions towards the article, everything else seems to be helpful information. There does not seem to be any back and forth conversation with the editors, it all seems balanced.

The overall article does not seem too bad, everything seems correct and up to date. Going back to the talk page, everyone seemed to catch any misinformation of the film. The only issue I would have would be the plot, some word formats, and maybe adding more images.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)