User:Gizelleg25/Jane J. Robinson/AmoderateDflatmajor Peer Review

General info
Gizelleg25
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Gizelleg25/Jane J. Robinson
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Jane J. Robinson

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is no lead for the article, but the article body as it exists seems like it could function as a lead, especially considering the lead in the live version of the article is so short. The text would be benefited by adding links to other Wikipedia pages, such as "machine translation" and "ACL," among other terms. You have one reference listed twice in the References section, and the two citations you have in the body itself (the one with the link and the Grosz citation) would more smoothly integrate into the article by using the citation tool provided by Wikipedia.